DERMATOLOGY / RESEARCH PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Atopic dermatitis (AD), the most common chronic inflammatory dermatosis, currently lacks definitive curative treatments. This study aimed to identify potential drug targets for AD through an integrative genomic approach.

Material and methods:
Cis-expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) from the eQTLGen consortium were used as genetic instruments for druggable genes. Summary-level AD statistics were obtained from the largest available GWAS dataset (cases = 22,474; controls = 774,187) with replication in an independent cohort (cases = 10,788; controls = 30,047). Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to explore the causal relationship between druggable genes and AD risk, augmented by colocalization analysis to identify shared causal variants. A pQTL dataset was thereafter utilized for further validation. Furthermore, the potential association between the identified genes and five other inflammatory skin diseases was also assessed. Finally, we specifically investigated expression patterns of identified genes through analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics data from GEO datasets via Seurat.

Results:
Three druggable genes, HSP90AA1, IL2RA, and MANBA, were positively associated with an increased risk of AD. Colocalization analysis identified rs61839660 as a shared variant between IL2RA and AD, with pQTL data confirming IL2RA protein-level effects. Increased IL2RA gene expression was observed in natural killer cells within leukocyte infiltration regions. Moreover, MR analysis indicated that IL2RA gene expression also heightens the risk of psoriasis and eczema, though without colocalization evidence.

Conclusions:
These findings suggest that IL2RA inhibitors could be promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of AD.
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Stander, S., Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med, 2021. 384(12): p. 1136-1143.
 
2.
Weidinger, S. and N. Novak, Atopic dermatitis. Lancet, 2016. 387(10023): p. 1109-1122.
 
3.
Schuler, C.F.t., et al., Novel insights into atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2023. 151(5): p. 1145-1154.
 
4.
Hinkson, I.V., B. Madej, and E.A. Stahlberg, Accelerating Therapeutics for Opportunities in Medicine: A Paradigm Shift in Drug Discovery. Front Pharmacol, 2020. 11: p. 770.
 
5.
Hughes, J.P., et al., Principles of early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol, 2011. 162(6): p. 1239-49.
 
6.
Kiriiri, G.K., P.M. Njogu, and A.N. Mwangi, Exploring different approaches to improve the success of drug discovery and development projects: a review. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020. 6(1): p. 27.
 
7.
Hay, M., et al., Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat Biotechnol, 2014. 32(1): p. 40-51.
 
8.
Nelson, M.R., et al., The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications. Nat Genet, 2015. 47(8): p. 856-60.
 
9.
Smith, G.D. and S. Ebrahim, 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol, 2003. 32(1): p. 1-22.
 
10.
Emdin, C.A., A.V. Khera, and S. Kathiresan, Mendelian Randomization. JAMA, 2017. 318(19): p. 1925-1926.
 
11.
Chen, Y., et al., Genetic insights into therapeutic targets for aortic aneurysms: A Mendelian randomization study. EBioMedicine, 2022. 83: p. 104199.
 
12.
Lin, J., J. Zhou, and Y. Xu, Potential drug targets for multiple sclerosis identified through Mendelian randomization analysis. Brain, 2023. 146(8): p. 3364-3372.
 
13.
Chen, J., et al., Therapeutic targets for inflammatory bowel disease: proteome-wide Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses. EBioMedicine, 2023. 89: p. 104494.
 
14.
Chauquet, S., et al., Association of Antihypertensive Drug Target Genes With Psychiatric Disorders: A Mendelian Randomization Study. JAMA Psychiatry, 2021. 78(6): p. 623-631.
 
15.
Henry, A., et al., Therapeutic Targets for Heart Failure Identified Using Proteomics and Mendelian Randomization. Circulation, 2022. 145(16): p. 1205-1217.
 
16.
Yuan, S., et al., Mendelian randomization and clinical trial evidence supports TYK2 inhibition as a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. EBioMedicine, 2023. 89: p. 104488.
 
17.
Chen, L., et al., Systematic Mendelian randomization using the human plasma proteome to discover potential therapeutic targets for stroke. Nat Commun, 2022. 13(1): p. 6143.
 
18.
Finan, C., et al., The druggable genome and support for target identification and validation in drug development. Sci Transl Med, 2017. 9(383).
 
19.
Vosa, U., et al., Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression. Nat Genet, 2021. 53(9): p. 1300-1310.
 
20.
Sliz, E., et al., Uniting biobank resources reveals novel genetic pathways modulating susceptibility for atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2022. 149(3): p. 1105-1112 e9.
 
21.
Paternoster, L., et al., Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of 21,000 cases and 95,000 controls identifies new risk loci for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet, 2015. 47(12): p. 1449-1456.
 
22.
Kurki, M.I., et al., FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature, 2023. 613(7944): p. 508-518.
 
23.
Jin, Y., et al., Genome-wide association studies of autoimmune vitiligo identify 23 new risk loci and highlight key pathways and regulatory variants. Nat Genet, 2016. 48(11): p. 1418-1424.
 
24.
Palmer, T.M., et al., Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors. Stat Methods Med Res, 2012. 21(3): p. 223-42.
 
25.
Hartwig, F.P., et al., Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique. Int J Epidemiol, 2016. 45(6): p. 1717-1726.
 
26.
Teumer, A., Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2018. 5: p. 51.
 
27.
Burgess, S., et al., Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol, 2015. 30(7): p. 543-52.
 
28.
Burgess, S., A. Butterworth, and S.G. Thompson, Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol, 2013. 37(7): p. 658-65.
 
29.
Bowden, J., G. Davey Smith, and S. Burgess, Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol, 2015. 44(2): p. 512-25.
 
30.
Bowden, J., et al., Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol, 2016. 40(4): p. 304-14.
 
31.
Mitamura, Y., et al., Spatial transcriptomics combined with single-cell RNA-sequencing unravels the complex inflammatory cell network in atopic dermatitis. Allergy, 2023. 78(8): p. 2215-2231.
 
32.
Liao, W., J.X. Lin, and W.J. Leonard, Interleukin-2 at the crossroads of effector responses, tolerance, and immunotherapy. Immunity, 2013. 38(1): p. 13-25.
 
33.
Robert, C. and T.S. Kupper, Inflammatory skin diseases, T cells, and immune surveillance. N Engl J Med, 1999. 341(24): p. 1817-28.
 
34.
Moreau, J.M., et al., Regulatory T cells promote innate inflammation after skin barrier breach via TGF-beta activation. Sci Immunol, 2021. 6(62).
 
35.
Salim, A., R.M. Emerson, and K.L. Dalziel, Successful treatment of severe generalized pustular psoriasis with basiliximab (interleukin-2 receptor blocker). Br J Dermatol, 2000. 143(5): p. 1121-2.
 
36.
Owen, C.M. and P.V. Harrison, Successful treatment of severe psoriasis with basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2000. 25(3): p. 195-7.
 
37.
Wallace, C., A more accurate method for colocalisation analysis allowing for multiple causal variants. PLoS Genet, 2021. 17(9): p. e1009440.
 
eISSN:1896-9151
ISSN:1734-1922
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top