INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE / CLINICAL RESEARCH
Nurse-led multidisciplinary cooperation for early screening and protection of fecal water dermatitis in hospitalized patients with enterostomy
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan, China
2
Department of Nursing, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, China
Submission date: 2021-02-03
Final revision date: 2021-07-01
Acceptance date: 2021-07-20
Online publication date: 2021-07-27
Publication date: 2024-08-04
Corresponding author
Zhe Li
Department of Nursing, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, No.89 of JingCi Street, WangBoLing District,, 030024, Taiyuan, China
Arch Med Sci 2024;20(4):1180-1188
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This study aimed to investigate the effect of nurse-led multidisciplinary cooperation in the early screening and protection of fecal water dermatitis in hospitalized patients with enterostomy.
Material and methods:
An enterostomy management team led by nurses with multidisciplinary cooperation was established to investigate the current situation of fecal water dermatitis in patients with enterostomy in our hospital, and the causes of fecal water dermatitis were analyzed. Based on the evidence-based results, the management plan for the prevention of fecal water dermatitis in patients with enterostomy was implemented. The related indicators before and after the implementation of a nurse-led multidisciplinary cooperation management program were compared.
Results:
The incidence of fecal water dermatitis in patients with enterostomy decreased from 45.56% to 20.73%, the screening rate of nutritional risk for patients with enterostomy increased from 45.57% to 97.56%, the accuracy of stoma positioning by nurses was increased from 65.82% to 98.78%, the incidence of basement warping in enterostomy was decreased from 29.80% to 1.95%, the incidence of fecal water leakage decreased from 50.76% to 22.53%, the 1-hour leakage rate of stoma basement increased from 4.48% to 97.29%, the awareness rate of patients’ related knowledge increased from 43.03% to 80.48%, and the average score of self-care ability of patients (family members) increased from 99.5 to 126.7. Patients’ mean quality of life scores increased from 80.73 to 98.57, and patients’ mean self-efficacy scores increased from 78.34 to 99.26. The differences in the above indicators were statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
Nurse-led multidisciplinary cooperation can improve early screening and protection of fecal water dermatitis in hospitalized patients with enterostomy and improve the quality of life of patients.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
de’Angelis N, Baldini C, Brustia R, et al. Surgical and regional treatments for colorectal cancer metastases in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0251005.
2.
Armstrong KA, Coyte PC, Brown M, Beber B, Semple JL. Effect of home monitoring via mobile app on the number of in-person visits following ambulatory surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 622-7.
3.
World Health Orgnization. Global 2012:estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. International Agency for Research on cancer (IARC) (2012), 2014 [2016-11-15].
4.
Chen HD, Dai M. On prevention and control strategy of colorectal cancer in China. Chin J Epidemiol 2020; 41: 1627-2.
5.
Mattiuzzi C, Sanchis-Gomar F, Lippi G. Concise update on colorectal cancer epidemiology. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7: 609.
6.
Longchamp G, Meyer J, Abbassi Z, et al. Current surgical strategies for the treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma and the risk of local recurrence. Dig Dis 2021; 39: 325-33.
7.
Wong MC, Avanzini S, Mosconi M, et al. Enterostomy-related complications in Hirschsprung’s disease in a single cohort. Minerva Pediatr 2019; DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.19.05593-2.
8.
Wu XL, Wang LK, Huang XT, et al. Retrospective study on the epidemiological characteristics of colorectal cancer. China Med Herald 2019; 16: 60-3.
9.
Carlsson E, Fingren J, Hallén AM, Petersén C, Lindholm E. The prevalence of ostomy-related complications 1 year after ostomy surgery: a prospective, descriptive, clinical study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2016; 62: 34-48.
10.
Malik T, Lee MJ, Harikrishnan AB. The incidence of stoma related morbidity – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018; 100: 501-8.
11.
Taneja C, Netsch D, Rolstad BS, Inglese G, Lamerato L, Oster G. Clinical and economic burden of peristomal skin complications in patients with recent ostomies. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44: 350-7.
12.
Maydick-Youngberg D. A descriptive study to explore the effect of peristomal skin complications on quality of life of adults with a permanent ostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 2017; 63: 10-23.
13.
Zhou XH. Advances in the care of peri-enterostomy fecal dermatitis. Today Nurse 2018; 25: 13-5.
14.
Karabulut HK, Dinç L, Karadag A. Effects of planned group interactions on the social adaptation of individuals with an intestinal stoma: a quantitative study. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23: 2800-13.
15.
Khalilzadeh Ganjalikhani M, Tirgari B, Roudi Rashtabadi O, Shahesmaeili A. Studying the effect of structured ostomy care training on quality of life and anxiety of patients with permanent ostomy. Int Wound J 2019; 16: 1383-90.
16.
Bai HH, Yao QJ, Zhu XJ, et al. Dysphagia screening and rehabilitation nursing of cerebral hemorrhage patients in postoperative early stage. Chin J Nurs 2013; 48: 299-301.
17.
Rabito EI, Marcadenti A, da Silva Fink J, Figueira L, Silva FM. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Malnutrition Screening Tool, and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool are good predictors of nutrition risk in an emergency service. Nutr Clin Pract 2017; 32: 526-32.
18.
Guo YL, Dong XF, Yang CX, et al. Practice of multidisciplinary team to improve nutritional outcomes of patients with post-stroke dysphagia. Chin Nursing Manag 2019; 19: 662-6.
19.
Wilkinson J, Carryer J, Budge C. Impact of postgraduate education on advanced practice nurse activity – a national survey. Int Nurs Rev 2018; 65: 417-24.
20.
Cable S, Graham E. “Leading Better Care”: an evaluation of an accelerated coaching intervention for clinical nursing leadership development. J Nurs Manag 2018; 26: 605-12.
21.
Indreb KL, Aasprang A, Olsen TE, et al. A new model of patient-reported outcome monitoring with a clinical feedback system in ostomy care: rationale, description and evaluation protocol. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18: 12.
22.
Ayik C, Zden D, Cenan D. Ostomy complications, risk factors, and applied nursing care: a retrospective, descriptive study. Wound Manag Prev 2020; 66: 20-30.
23.
Luo WX, Shi XR. Effect of nursing intervention on fecal water dermatitis after ileostomy. Electronic J Pract Clin Nurs Sci 2020; 5: 81-3.
24.
White M. Stoma care nurses: always ready to rise to the challenge. Br J Nurs 2020; 29: S3.
25.
Barry H. Stoma care: procedures, appliances and nursing considerations. Br J Nurs 2020; 29: S14-9.
26.
Carter P. Recognising the importance of stoma care nurse specialists. Br J Nurs 2020; 29: S4.