ONCOLOGY / CLINICAL RESEARCH
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) treatment only relies on the standard treatment of nonspecific invasive breast cancer (NSIBC), and it remains controversial whether the survival of patients improves. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of IMPC and to investigate the factors affecting its prognosis.

Material and methods:
This retrospective cohort study included 104 IMPC patients who met the study’s inclusion criteria out of a total of 4,532 patients with invasive breast cancer between January 2015 and December 2019. A contemporaneous cohort of 230 patients with non-specific invasive breast cancer (NSIBC) who underwent surgery was identified and matched using propensity scores.

Results:
The survival rate for patients with IMPC ranged from 1.12% to 7.03%. Statistically significant differences were observed in the proportion of endocrine treatment, lymphatic invasion, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive rate, molecular subtypes, molecular typing, and 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) between the two cohorts (p < 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that T stage, N stage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, ER-positive rate, and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative rate were all prognosis risk factors (p < 0.05) for IMPC. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis indicated that lymphatic invasion and N stage were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:
The incidence of micropapillary IMPC, among other pathological subtypes, is steadily increasing. ER-positive and PR-positive rates, as well as luminal subtypes, are frequent, with a concurrent increase in the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate. It would be interesting to compare the effect following these therapeutic modifications in larger cohorts in future studies.

 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Tarighati E, Keivan H, Mahani H. A review of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23: 1-16.
 
2.
Koczkodaj P, Sulkowska U, Gotlib J, Mańczuk M. Breast cancer mortality trends in Europe among women in perimenopausal and postmenopausal age (45+). Arch Med Sci 2020; 16: 146-56.
 
3.
Badowska-Kozakiewicz AM, Budzik MP, Liszcz A, et al. Clinicopathological factors associated with novel prognostic markers for patients with triple negative breast cancer. Arch Med Sci 2019; 15: 1433-42.
 
4.
Fisher ER, Palekar AS, Redmond C, Barton B, Fisher B. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4). VI. Invasive papillary cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 1980; 73: 313-22.
 
5.
Xie LL, Xu ZH, Wei DH, Xu CS. A meta-analysis of the association between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and surgical outcomes in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Arch Med Sci; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/1....
 
6.
Kędzierawski P, Bocian A, Radowicz-Chil A, Huruk-Kuchinka A, Mężyk R. Subtype of breast cancer influences sentinel lymph node positivity. Arch Med Sci 2023; 19: 618-25.
 
7.
Siriaunkgul S, Tavassoli FA. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol 1993; 6: 660-2.
 
8.
Böcker W. WHO classification of breast tumors and tumors of the female genital organs: pathology and genetics. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 2002; 86: 116-9.
 
9.
Carabias-Meseguer P, Zapardiel I, Cusidó-Gimferrer M, et al. Influence of the in situ component in 389 infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer 2013; 20: 213-7.
 
10.
Chen H, Bai F, Wang M, et al. The prognostic significance of co-existence ductal carcinoma in situ in invasive ductal breast cancer: a large population-based study and a matched case-control analysis. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7:484.
 
11.
Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours [M]. Lyon, IARC Press 2003; 35-6.
 
12.
Liu Z, Wang M, Wang Y, Shen X, Li C. Diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma in the breast: a case report and literature review. Arch Med Sci 2022; 18: 279-83.
 
13.
Liu Y, Zhong L, Wang l, et al. Incidence of breast cancer and methylation of PCDH gene: a single ratio meta analysis of single rate. Arch Med Sci DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/1....
 
14.
Li W, Han Y, Wang C, et al. Precise pathologic diagnosis and individualized treatment improve the outcomes of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a 12-year prospective clinical study. Modern Pathol 2018; 31: 956-64.
 
15.
Ide Y, Horii R, Osako T, et al. Clinicopathological significance of invasive micropapillary carcinoma component in invasive breast carcinoma. Pathol Int 2011; 61: 731-6.
 
16.
Gokce H, Durak MG, Akin MM, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma. Breast J 2013; 19: 374-81.
 
17.
Fu L, Ikuo M, Fu XY, et al. Relationship between biologic behavior and morphologic features of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2004; 33: 21-5.
 
18.
Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Ciris M, Bayramoglu H, Ozdemir N. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma. Histopathology 2004; 44: 18-23.
 
19.
Günhan-Bilgen I, Zekioglu O, Ustün EE, Memis A, Erhan Y. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 927-31.
 
20.
Yoon GY, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al. Comparison of invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a matched cohort study. Acta Radiol 2019; 60: 1405-13.
 
21.
Lewis GD, Xing Y, Haque W, et al. The impact of molecular status on survival outcomes for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Breast J 2019; 25: 1171-6.
 
eISSN:1896-9151
ISSN:1734-1922
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top