INFECTIOUS DISEASES / CLINICAL RESEARCH
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The aim of the study was to identify the key risk factors influencing in-intensive care unit (ICU) mortality of patients with sepsis and develop prognosis prediction models for culture-positive sepsis (CPS) and culture-negative sepsis (CNS) patients.

Material and methods:
Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database, which included 9288 patients with sepsis. The whole sample was divided into CPS (6622 patients) and CNS groups (2666 patients). We established six machine learning models – DT, RF, NB, XGB, GBDT, and NNET – to predict in-ICU death for all study samples, as well as for CPS and CNS subgroups. Model performance was assessed using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to explain the effect of variables on model results.

Results:
The in-ICU mortality rate was 54.58% for the whole study sample; the difference in in-ICU mortality between the CPS (55.19%) and CNS (53.04%) groups was not statistically significant. The main significant influential factors identified included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), number of days in hospital, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), older age, and total bilirubin (TBil). The XGB model performed best in the overall sample (AUC = 0.782), while the GBDT model was most effective for the CPS group (AUC = 0.7813) and the CNS group (AUC = 0.7582).

Conclusions:
This study identified key risk factors for in-ICU death in patients with sepsis and highlighted differences in clinical characteristics between patients with CPS and CNS. These findings may contribute to the development of personalized treatment strategies and risk assessment, thereby improving the prognosis of septic patients, especially patients with CNS.
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Sorce LR, et al. International consensus criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock. JAMA 2024; 331: 665-74.
 
2.
Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet 2018; 392: 75-87.
 
3.
Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing recovery from sepsis: a review. JAMA 2018; 319: 62-75.
 
4.
Oshima T, Kodama Y, Takahashi W, et al. Empiric antibiotic therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock. Surg Infect 2016; 17: 210-6.
 
5.
Chun K, Syndergaard C, Damas C, et al. Sepsis pathogen identification. J Lab Autom 2015; 20: 539-61.
 
6.
Gatica S, Fuentes B, Rivera-Asín E, et al. Novel evidence on sepsis-inducing pathogens: from laboratory to bedside. Front Microbiol 2023; 14: 1198200.
 
7.
Ou Q, Cai G, Zhou Y, Wen M. [Analysis of clinical features and risk factors for mortality in patients with culture-negative sepsis: a single-center retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2021; 33: 1181-6.
 
8.
Kim JS, Kim YJ, Kim WY. Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Crit Care 2021; 25: 11.
 
9.
Hazwani TR, Kazzaz YM, Alsugheir S, et al. Association between culture-negative versus culture-positive sepsis and outcomes of patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Cureus 2020; 12: e9981.
 
10.
Baker AH, Leland SB, Freiman E, Herigon JC, Eisenberg MA. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-positive and culture-negative pediatric sepsis. J Pediatr 2023; 263: 113718.
 
11.
Phua J, Ngerng W, See K, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. Crit Care 2013; 17: R202.
 
12.
Paul M, Shani V, Muchtar E, Kariv G, Robenshtok E, Leibovici L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 4851-63.
 
13.
Nemati S, Holder A, Razmi F, Stanley MD, Clifford GD, Buchman TG. An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 547-53.
 
14.
Persson I, Östling A, Arlbrandt M, Söderberg J, Becedas D. A machine learning sepsis prediction algorithm for intended intensive care unit use (NAVOY Sepsis): proof-of-concept study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5: e28000.
 
15.
Yao RQ, Jin X, Wang GW, et al. A machine learning-based prediction of hospital mortality in patients with postoperative sepsis. Front Med 2020; 7: 445.
 
16.
Zhou H, Liu L, Zhao Q, et al. Machine learning for the prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury during hospitalization. Front Immunol 2023; 14: 1140755.
 
17.
Yang Z, Cui X, Song Z. Predicting sepsis onset in ICU using machine learning models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23: 635.
 
18.
Johnson AEW, Bulgarelli L, Shen L, et al. MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset [published correction appears in Sci Data. 2023 Jan 16;10(1):31] [published correction appears in Sci Data. 2023 Apr 18;10(1):219]. Sci Data 2023; 10: 1.
 
19.
Chen S, Hu W, Yang Y, et al. Predicting six-month re-admission risk in heart failure patients using multiple machine learning methods: a study based on the chinese heart failure population database. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 870.
 
20.
Münch MM, Peeters CFW, Van Der Vaart AW, Van De Wiel MA. Adaptive group-regularized logistic elastic net regression. Biostatistics 2021; 22: 723-37.
 
21.
Bloom BM, Pott J, Thomas S, Gaunt DR, Hughes TC. Usability of electronic health record systems in UK EDs. Emerg Med J 2021; 38: 410-5.
 
22.
Ince C, Mayeux PR, Nguyen T, et al. The endothelium in sepsis. Shock 2016; 45: 259-70.
 
23.
Manan MM, Ibrahim NA, Aziz NA, Zulkifly HH, Al-Worafi YM, Long CM. Empirical use of antibiotic therapy in the prevention of early onset sepsis in neonates: a pilot study. Arch Med Sci 2016; 12: 603-13.
 
24.
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 2021; 49: e1063-143.
 
25.
Su L, Liu S, Yang Y, et al. Positive fluid balance and poor outcomes after initial intensive care unit admission in sepsis resuscitation: a retrospective study. Arch Med Sci 2024; 20: 464-75.
 
26.
Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge. Crit Care Med 2016; 44: 880-91.
 
27.
Ibarra-Estrada M, Kattan E, Aguilera-González P, et al. Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2023; 27: 110.
 
28.
Ohbe H, Sasabuchi Y, Doi K, Matsui H, Yasunaga H. Association between levels of intensive care and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for sepsis stratified by sequential organ failure assessment scores. Crit Care Med 2023; 51: 1138-47.
 
29.
Nejtek T, Müller M, Moravec M, Průcha M, Zazula R. Bacteremia in patients with sepsis in the ICU: does it make a difference? Microorganisms 2023; 11: 2357.
 
30.
Sigakis MJG, Jewell E, Maile MD, Cinti SK, Bateman BT, Engoren M. Culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis: a comparison of characteristics and outcomes. Anesth Analg 2019; 129: 1300-9.
 
31.
Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 15-21.
 
32.
Kübler A, Adamik B, Durek G, et al. Results of the severe sepsis registry in intensive care units in Poland from 2003-2009. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2015; 47: 7-13.
 
33.
Qi D, Peng M. Early hemoglobin status as a predictor of long-term mortality for sepsis patients in intensive care units. Shock 2021; 55: 215-23.
 
34.
Priyanka P, Zarbock A, Izawa J, Gleason TG, Renfurm RW, Kellum JA. The impact of acute kidney injury by serum creatinine or urine output criteria on major adverse kidney events in cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162: 143-51.e7.
 
35.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-4.
 
36.
Kaddourah A, Basu RK, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL; AWARE Investigators. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill children and young adults. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 11-20.
 
37.
Matsuda W, Kimura A, Uemura T. The reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale score can predict the need for initial resuscitation in patients suspected of sepsis. Glob Health Med 2023; 5: 223-8.
 
eISSN:1896-9151
ISSN:1734-1922
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top